Smith v. Illinois Association of School Boards et al

Filing 129

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 112 Motion to Strike. The Court STRIKES exhibits 50, 54, and 55 from defendant IASB's summary judgment brief. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 8/24/11. (klh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CURTIS A. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS, et al., Defendants. No.: 3-10-00242-DRH ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: Now before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to strike uncited exhibits from IASB’s memorandum in support of motion for summary judgment (Doc. 112). Specifically, plaintiff moves to strike from the record IASB exhibits 3, 7-8, 11-17, 2027, 29-50, 57-59, 61-65, 70-73, 77-78, 81-84, 86-92, 99-101, 105, 107, 113, 117, and 119-120 arguing that IASB did not cite to these exhibits in its summary judgment brief. Defendant does not object to the motion as to exhibits 50, 54 and 55. However, defendant contends that in order for there to be a complete record, it filed the entire transcripts and exhibits for each of the depositions referenced and that some of the exhibits plaintiff moves to strike it did reference those exhibits. Page 1 of 2 Based on the reasons in defendant’s response, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion to strike. The Court GRANTS the motion as to exhibits 50, 54, and 55 and DENIES the motion as to the remaining exhibits. Thus, the Court STRIKES exhibits 50, 54 and 55 from defendant’s summary judgment brief. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 24th day of August, 2011. Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2011.08.24 13:19:59 -05'00' Chief Judge United States District Court Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?