Towns v. Cowan et al

Filing 138

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 131 in its entirety. Denying 96 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 115 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/16/2011. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SHERRELL C. TOWNS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 10-cv-264-JPG-PMF REBECCA COWAN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 131) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Keith Anderson, Rebecca Cowan, Daniel Dunn, John Inman, Thomas Maue, Thomas Mezo, Craig Mitchell, Russell Niepert and Krista Schorn (Doc. 96) and the motion for default judgment filed by plaintiff Sherrell C. Towns (Doc. 115). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 131) and DENIES the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Keith Anderson, Rebecca Cowan, Daniel Dunn, John Inman, Thomas Maue, Thomas Mezo, Craig Mitchell, Russell Niepert, and Krista Schorn (Doc. 96) and the motion for default judgment filed by plaintiff Sherrell C. Towns (Doc. 115). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 16, 2011 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?