Gore v. Alltel Communications, LLC et al

Filing 19

ORDER GRANTING 18 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply TO PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, OR ALTERNATIVELY TO STAY LITIGATION filed by Alltel Communications, LLC. Set/Res et Deadlines as to 11 MOTION to Compel Individual Arbitration or, Alternatively, to Stay Litigation Pending Disposition of AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion (Replies due by 12/13/2010). Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 11/29/10. (anj)

-DGW Gore v. Alltel Communications, LLC et al

Doc. 19

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CHRISTOPHER L. GORE, Plaintiff, v. ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, and ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, as Successor in Interest to SOUTHERN ILLINOIS CELLULAR CORP., d/b/a FIRST CELLULAR SOUTHERN ILLINOIS, Defendants. No. 10-735-DRH

ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: Before the Court is Defendants' Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, or Alternatively to Stay Litigation (Doc. 18). Specifically, Defendants request an extension of time up to and including December 13, 2010 in order to file a Reply to Plaintiff's Response as Plaintiff's Response raises complex legal issues and affirmative defenses which Defendants feel is necessary to address. Defendants state that they cannot file a Reply by the current deadline as the parties have agreed to discuss the issues in the case on November 29, 2010 which will require substantial preparation and Defendants will not have enough time to also draft a Reply. Based on the reasons set forth in the motion, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motion for extension of time (Doc. 18). Defendants will have up to and including December 13,

Dockets.Justia.com

2010 in which to file a Reply. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 29th day of November, 2010.

David R. Herndon 2010.11.29 12:08:59 -06'00'
Chief Judge United States District Court

Page 2 of 2