Shehadeh v. Cox et al

Filing 100

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Attorney George O. Suggs appointed to represent Jamal Shehadeh. Granting 99 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Adam Brooke Rucker terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 6/25/2012. (hbs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JAMAL SHEHADEH , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) WARDEN JOHN COX, LT. GLENN ) HOWARD, LT. BRETT CAMPBELL, ) NORMAN SUITS, AND CHARLES BATES, ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. 3:10-cv-985-DGW ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge: This matter comes before the Court on Attorney Adam B. Rucker’s Motion to Withdraw as Attorney from Appointment Due to Conflict of Interest (Doc. 99). This motion is GRANTED. The Court now APPOINTS Attorney George O. Suggs of the firm Schuchat, Cook & Werner to represent Plaintiff for all further proceedings in this Court. 1 Attorney Suggs is encouraged to share his responsibilities with an associate who is also admitted to practice in this district court. Attorney Suggs shall enter his appearance on or before July 9, 2012. Plaintiff is cautioned to consult with his counsel in this matter and to understand that it is Attorney Suggs who is the legal professional in this relationship. Without commenting on the validity of the matter in litigation, counsel is reminded and plaintiff is advised that counsel, even though appointed by the Court, has an obligation under the rules to refrain from filing frivolous pleadings. As a consequence, counsel may likely, from time to time, advise Plaintiff against taking 1 The Local Rules of the Southern District of Illinois direct that every member of the bar of this Court “shall be available for appointment by the Court to represent or assist in the representation of those who cannot afford to hire an attorney.” SDIL-LR 83.1(i). a certain course of action. While Plaintiff may not totally agree with counsel’s advice, he should realize that, in the long run, such advice will be in his best interest because it is in compliance with the law. Also, counsel may advise Plaintiff to pursue additional claims or to abandon certain existing claims. Counsel, of course, maintains an ethical obligation to fully and vigorously represent his client, but only to the extent that it does not impede his ethical obligation to follow the rules of the Court and the law. If Plaintiff wants to be represented by counsel, he will have to cooperate fully with counsel. The Court will not accept any filings from Plaintiff individually while he is represented by counsel, except a pleading that asks that he be allowed to have counsel withdraw from representation. If counsel is allowed to withdraw at the request of Plaintiff, it is unlikely the Court will appoint other counsel to represent him. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, if there is a monetary recovery in this case (either by verdict or settlement), any unpaid out-of-pocket costs must be paid from the proceeds. See SDIL-LR 3.1(c)(1). If there is no recovery in the case (or the costs exceed any recovery), the Court has the discretion reimburse expenses. The funds available for this purpose are limited, and counsel should use the utmost care when incurring out-of-pocket costs. In no event will funds be reimbursed if the expenditure is found to be without a proper basis. The Court has no authority to pay attorney’s fees in this case. Counsel is encouraged to enter into a contingent fee contract with Plaintiff to address both the payment of attorney’s fees and costs should Plaintiff prevail. Finally, counsel is informed that Plaintiff is currently incarcerated by the Illinois Department of Corrections at the Logan Correctional Center in Lincoln, Illinois. Information 2 about the facility is available at Counsel may use the Illinois Department of Corrections’s videoconferencing system to confer with Plaintiff. The Court asks the Assistant Attorney General assigned to this case to facilitate those arrangements. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order and the standard letter concerning appointment of counsel to Attorney George O. Suggs immediately. Plaintiff is directed to consult with his attorney regarding the filing of appropriate motions. DATED: June 25, 2012 DONALD G. WILKERSON United States Magistrate Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?