Moore v. Bayer Corporation et al
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 10/24/11. (skp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ
(DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
MDL No. 2100
Order Dismissing With
This Document Relates to:
Ashley Bopp v. Bayer Corp., et al.
Meagan Moore v. Bayer Corp., et al.
Jennie Coachman v. Bayer Corp., et
al. No. 3:10-cv-11016-DRH-PMF
Nicole Powell v. Bayer Corp., et al.
Cora Gaudio v. Bayer Corp., et al.
Janessa Turner v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No.
Kathryn Harris v. Bayer Corp., et al.
Tereasa Turner v. Bayer Corp., et al.
Nina Kendrick v. Bayer Corp., et al.
ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE
This matter is before the Court on defendant Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s (“Bayer”) motion, pursuant to Case Management Order 12
(“CMO 12”), for an Order dismissing plaintiffs’ claims in the above-captioned
matters with prejudice for failure to comply with their Plaintiff Fact Sheet (“PFS”)
On June 30, 2011, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. moved to
dismiss the above-captioned matters without prejudice for failure to comply with
PFS obligations.1 The Court granted these motions on July 21, 2011.2 More than
60 days since the entry of the order of dismissal without prejudice has passed,
and Plaintiffs still have not complied with their PFS obligations. Accordingly, on
September 23, 2011, pursuant to Section E of CMO 12, Bayer moved for an
Order converting the dismissal without prejudice to a dismissal with prejudice.
None of the plaintiffs has responded to Bayer’s motion.
Having considered the motion and the relevant provisions of CMO 12
the Court ORDERS as follows:
Plaintiffs in the above captioned actions have failed to comply with
their obligations pursuant to CMO 12 and more than 60 days have passed since
the entry of the order of dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with
CMO 12. Accordingly, pursuant to Section E of CMO 12, plaintiffs’ complaints
Bopp DOC. 6; Coachman DOC. 6; Gaudio DOC. 6; Harris DOC. 7; Kendrick DOC. 6; Moore
DOC. 6; Powell DOC. 6; J. Turner DOC. 8; T. Turner DOC. 6.
Bopp DOC. 7; Coachman DOC. 7; Gaudio DOC. 7; Harris DOC. 8; Kendrick DOC. 7; Moore
DOC. 7; Powell DOC. 7; J. Turner DOC. 9; T. Turner DOC. 7.
are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Further, the Court directs the Clerk of
the Court to enter judgment reflecting the same. Each party shall bear its own
Digitally signed by David R.
Date: 2011.10.24 11:14:02 -05'00'
United States District Court
Date: October 24, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?