McClelland v. Bayer Corporation et al

Filing 13

CLERK'S JUDGMENT Dismissing Case with Prejudice Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 9/30/2014. JPML notified of dismissal. (cds)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ ) 3:09-md-02100-DRH (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES ) PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY ) MDL No. 2100 LITIGATION ) This Document Relates To: Vanessa Bartolini v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 11-cv-11496-DRH Danika Carlson v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 10-cv-13017-DRH Monique Jones v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 11-cv-13319-DRH Jill Kofler v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 11-cv-10399-DRH Diana Lagoda v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 11-cv-11693-DRH Shannon McClelland v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 10-cv-12838-DRH Karen Randall v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 10-cv-10791-DRH Elizabeth Ryman v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 13-cv-10418-DRH Mayra Serrano v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 10-cv-12854-DRH Carmen Sigurdson v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 10-cv-12857-DRH Sierra Simpson v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 11-cv-10093-DRH Stephanie Stanley v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 09-cv-10084-DRH Jessica Terry v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 10-cv-12861-DRH Alona Triplett v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 09-cv-10140-DRH Michele Vinole v. Bayer Corporation et al No. 10-cv-10116-DRH JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE DECISION BY COURT. These matters are before the Court for the purpose of docket control. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Stipulations of Dismissal filed on September 29, 2014, the above captioned cases are DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs. JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK OF COURT BY: /s/Caitlin Fischer Deputy Clerk Date: September 30, 2014 APPROVED: Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2014.09.30 06:40:23 -05'00' CHIEF JUDGE U. S. DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?