Talbot v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
Filing
13
CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 10/29/2013. (slj)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ
(DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
)
)
)
)
)
3:09-md-02100-DRH
MDL No. 2100
This Document Relates To:
Alesia N. Daniels v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 11-cv-11716-DRH
Jocelyn B. Doby v. Bayer HealthCare
DRH
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No.
10-cv-13712-
Mary Katherine Jones, et al. v. Bayer
DRH
HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No.
11-cv-12300-
Rachel Talbot v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 10-cv-13549-DRH
Luciana Zeigler v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 11-cv-10897-DRH
Connie Holder v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 11-cv-11074-DRH
Kathryn Ocampo v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 11-cv-11809-DRH
Amanda Bodkins, et al. v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 10-cv-10757-DRH
Kimela Marcum v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 10-cv-11663-DRH
Sharon Anne Fox v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 10-cv-13315-DRH
Mary Katherine Newcomb v.. Bayer HealthCare No. 12-cv-10844-DRH
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
Lekecia C. Milam v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 10-cv-20245-DRH
Deborah Williams, et al. v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 10-cv-20027-DRH
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
DECISION BY COURT.
These matters are before the Court for the
purpose of docket control.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the
Stipulations of Dismissal filed on October 21, 2013, the above captioned cases
are DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs.
NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL,
CLERK OF COURT
BY:
Dated: October 29, 2013
APPROVED:
David R.
Herndon
2013.10.29
13:06:49 -05'00'
CHIEF JUDGE
U. S. DISTRICT COURT
2
/s/Sara Jennings
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?