RUDD v. BAYER CORPORATION et al

Filing 13

CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 7/15/2013. (slj)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) 3:09-md-02100-DRH MDL 2100 This Document Relates To: Karen Ross v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. , et al. 3:09-cv-10071-DRH Paula Ellis v. Bayer Corporation, et al. 3:10-cv-11525-DRH Barbie Bretz. v. Bayer Corporation, et al. 3:10-cv-11733-DRH Brenda Loughrey v. Bayer Schering Pharma AG, et al. 3:10-cv-12812-DRH Paula Bowman v. Bayer Corporation, et al. 3:10-cv-20112-DRH Faye Rudd v. Bayer Corporation, et al. DRH 3:10-cv-20155- Jolene Pittillo. v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. 3:11-cv-11871-DRH JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE DECISION BY COURT. These matters are before the Court for the purpose of docket control. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Stipulations of Dismissal filed on July 3, 2013, the above captioned cases are DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs. NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, CLERK OF COURT BY: Dated: July 15, 2013 APPROVED: David R. Herndon 2013.07.15 13:14:14 -05'00' CHIEF JUDGE U. S. DISTRICT COURT /s/Sara Jennings Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?