Katherine L. Murphy et al v. Bayer Corporation et al

Filing 20

ORDER granting 14 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 3-22-2011. (dsw)

-PMF Katherine L. Murphy et al v. Bayer Corporation et al

Doc. 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ------------------------------------------------------------ X IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND RELEVANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION : : : Judge David R. Herndon 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF MDL No. 2100

------------------------------------------------------------ : This Document Relates to:

Maricella Reyes, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20433 Janneth Berryman, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20434 Meredith Fox, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20435 Adela Sanchez, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20436 Darlene Victor, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20443 Nicole Behlow, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20444 Irma Gonzalez, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20445 Jackie C. Knott, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20494 Corrine M. Ratcliff, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20495 Rolanda Coleman, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:09-cv-20496

Dockets.Justia.com

Katherine L. Murphy, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:10-cv-20506 Kimble L. Colbert, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:11-cv-20018 Jessy Quintana-Yong, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al. Case No. 3:11-cv-20019 ______________________________________

ORDER

On March 21, 2011, the parties in the above captioned actions filed identical stipulations (see e.g. Reyes 3:10-cv-20433 Doc. 20). The stipulations state that, in light of this Court's orders remanding Ryan Bleecher, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-20382-DRH-PMF (Doc. 32) and Josefina Brambila, et al., v. Bayer Corp., et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-20248-DRH-PMF (Doc. 27), the parties stipulate and agree that the above-captioned matters be remanded to state court, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the removal and other proceedings in federal court. See e.g., Id. Upon consideration of the parties' stipulations, the Court ORDERS as follows: Plaintiffs' motions to remand to state court are GRANTED.

Accordingly, the Clerk is instructed to REMAND the above captioned cases to the originating state court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Lastly, the Court will not award attorneys' fees and costs associated with Plaintiffs' motions to remand. SO ORDERED:
Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2011.03.22 12:58:44 -05'00'

Chief Judge United States District Court

DATE: March 22, 2011