Diaz v. Cox et al

Filing 9

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Plaintiff is ADVISED that although he has dismissed his case, he must still pay the filing fee for this case. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/24/2011. (tjk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MICHAEL DIAZ, #N-93764, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN COX and RONNA MOYERS, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 11-cv-0122-MJR ORDER DISMISSING CASE REAGAN, District Judge: On April 22, 2011, Plaintiff moved this Court for voluntary dismissal of the action (Doc. 7). Because neither Defendant has answered or moved for summary judgment (indeed, the docket sheet indicates they have not been served), Plaintiff has the right to voluntarily dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 7) and DISMISSES THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is ADVISED that although he has dismissed his case, he must still pay the filing fee for this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), (e)(2); Lucien v. Jockisch, 133 F.3d 464, 467 (7th Cir. 1998) (A prisoner incurs the obligation to pay the filing fee for a lawsuit when the suit is filed, and the obligation continues regardless of later developments in the suit, such as dismissal of the suit). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED May 24, 2011. /s/ MICHAEL J. REAGAN Michael J. Reagan United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?