Virden v. Astrue

Filing 33

ORDER granting 32 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 1/18/12. (klh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN VIRDEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 11-CV-0189-DRH ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s December 13, 2011 motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 32). Specifically, plaintiff moves the Court to grant fees and costs in the amount of $9,055.30. As of this date, defendant has not responded to the motion.1 Thus, the Court considers the failure to respond as an admission of the merits of the motion. Thus, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Court AWARDS plaintiff fees in the amount of $9,055.30 in fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 18th day of January, 2012. David R. Herndon 2012.01.18 10:04:21 -06'00' Chief Judge United States District Court 1 “Failure to file a timely response to a motion may, in the Court’s discretion, be considered an admission of the merits of the motion.” Local Rule 7.1(c)(1).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?