Virden v. Astrue
Filing
33
ORDER granting 32 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 1/18/12. (klh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
JUSTIN VIRDEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
No. 11-CV-0189-DRH
ORDER
HERNDON, Chief Judge:
Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s December 13, 2011 motion for attorney
fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 32). Specifically, plaintiff moves the
Court to grant fees and costs in the amount of $9,055.30. As of this date, defendant
has not responded to the motion.1 Thus, the Court considers the failure to respond
as an admission of the merits of the motion. Thus, the Court GRANTS the motion.
The Court AWARDS plaintiff fees in the amount of $9,055.30 in fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed this 18th day of January, 2012.
David R. Herndon
2012.01.18
10:04:21 -06'00'
Chief Judge
United States District Court
1
“Failure to file a timely response to a motion may, in the Court’s discretion, be considered
an admission of the merits of the motion.” Local Rule 7.1(c)(1).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?