Roberts v. Neal et al

Filing 102

CLERK'S JUDGMENT (NJR/bkl). Plaintiff's claims in Count 1 against defendants B. Neal, Jarrod Selby, Thad Woodside, Doty, Alvis and J. Davis are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's claims in Count 1 against defendants Puckett, Isaacs, Knope and Obadina are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claims in Count 2 against defendants Cindy Miller, Schuler, Evans, Jackie Miller and Randle are dismissed with prejudice. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/30/13. (bkl)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
CARL ROBERTS,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 11-cv-266-JPG

B. NEAL, JERROD SELBY, SEGREGATION
OFFICER DOTY, THAD WOODSIDE, N. PUCKETT,
CINDY MILLER, LT. SCHULER, DEBBIE ISAACS, J.
DAVIS, JOHN EVANS, RECEIVING OFFICER
ALVIS, N. KNOPE, O. OBADINA, JACKIE MILLER,
MICHAEL P. RANDLE,
Defendants.
JUDGMENT
This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court
having rendered a decision,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Carl Roberts’ claims in
Count 1 (deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment)
against defendants B. Neal, Jarrod Selby, Thad Woodside, Doty, Alvis and J. Davis are dismissed
without prejudice;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Carl Roberts’ claims in
Count 1 (deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment)
against defendants Puckett, Isaacs, Knope and Obadina are dismissed with prejudice;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Carl Roberts’ claims in
Count 2 (failure to follow grievance procedure) against defendants Cindy Miller, Schuler, Evans,
Jackie Miller and Randle are dismissed with prejudice.
DATED: January 30, 2013

NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, Clerk of Court
By: s/Brenda K. Lowe, Deputy Clerk

Approved:

s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE