Beasley v. Taylor et al
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING 44 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety; Granting 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ms Haskinson. Ms Haskinson terminated. Count 3 is Dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/15/13. (bkl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
QUINTON BEASLEY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 11-cv-459-JPG-PMF
LEE RYKER, LIEUTENANT STAFFORD,
SHERRY BENTON, PAMELA MORAN,
BILL RISSE, and MS. HASKINSON,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc.
44) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court grant defendant Ms.
Haskinson’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 40).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are
made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the
magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or
only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear
error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the R & R. The Court has reviewed the entire file
and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the
R & R in its entirety (Doc. 40) and GRANTS defendant Ms. Haskinson’s motion for summary
judgment (Doc. 40). Defendant Ms. Haskinson is DISMISSED from the case and Count 3 is
DISMISSED in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 15, 2013
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?