Marsiliano v. David et al

Filing 34

CLERK'S JUDGMENT (NJR/krm) in favor of Dr David against Anthony Marsiliano, Defendant Dr. David shall recover costs from plaintiff; in favor of Unknown Party 1 (HCU Administrator Jane Doe) and Unknown Party 2 (Grievance Officer John Doe) against Anthony Marsiliano; pursuant to the Court's Memorandum and Order entered September 6, 2012, severing Count 2 of plaintiff's complaint against defendant Dr. John Doe into a separate case, Dr. John Doe was dismissed. Approved by Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier on 8/20/13. (bkl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY MARSILIANO, Plaintiff, vs. DR. DAVID, HCU ADMINISTRATOR JANE DOE, GRIEVANCE OFFICER JOHN DOE and DR. JOHN DOE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 11-cv-1036-PMF JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED pursuant to the Court’s Memorandum and Order entered August 20, 2013, (Doc. 33) that judgment is entered in favor of defendant Dr. David and against plaintiff Anthony Marsiliano. Defendant Dr. David shall recover costs from plaintiff Anthony Marsiliano. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED pursuant to the Court’s Memorandum and Order entered September 6, 2012, (Doc. No. 9) that judgment is entered in favor of defendants HCU Administrator Jane Doe and Grievance Officer John Doe and against plaintiff Anthony Marsiliano. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED pursuant to the Court’s Memorandum and Order entered September 6, 2012, (Doc. No. 9) severing Count 2 of plaintiff’s complaint against defendant Dr. John Doe into a separate case, Dr. John Doe was dismissed. DATED: August 20, 2013. APPROVED: s/ Philip M. Frazier HON. PHILIP M. FRAZIER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, CLERK By: s/Karen R. Metheney Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?