Marsiliano v. David et al
Filing
34
CLERK'S JUDGMENT (NJR/krm) in favor of Dr David against Anthony Marsiliano, Defendant Dr. David shall recover costs from plaintiff; in favor of Unknown Party 1 (HCU Administrator Jane Doe) and Unknown Party 2 (Grievance Officer John Doe) against Anthony Marsiliano; pursuant to the Court's Memorandum and Order entered September 6, 2012, severing Count 2 of plaintiff's complaint against defendant Dr. John Doe into a separate case, Dr. John Doe was dismissed. Approved by Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier on 8/20/13. (bkl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ANTHONY MARSILIANO,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DR. DAVID, HCU ADMINISTRATOR
JANE DOE, GRIEVANCE OFFICER
JOHN DOE and DR. JOHN DOE,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 11-cv-1036-PMF
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court
having rendered a decision,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED pursuant to the Court’s Memorandum and Order
entered August 20, 2013, (Doc. 33) that judgment is entered in favor of defendant Dr. David and
against plaintiff Anthony Marsiliano. Defendant Dr. David shall recover costs from plaintiff
Anthony Marsiliano.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED pursuant to the Court’s Memorandum
and Order entered September 6, 2012, (Doc. No. 9) that judgment is entered in favor of
defendants HCU Administrator Jane Doe and Grievance Officer John Doe and against plaintiff
Anthony Marsiliano.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED pursuant to the Court’s Memorandum
and Order entered September 6, 2012, (Doc. No. 9) severing Count 2 of plaintiff’s complaint
against defendant Dr. John Doe into a separate case, Dr. John Doe was dismissed.
DATED: August 20, 2013.
APPROVED:
s/ Philip M. Frazier
HON. PHILIP M. FRAZIER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, CLERK
By: s/Karen R. Metheney
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?