Parberry-Waller v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al

Filing 11

CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 3/20/2014. (slj)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) 3:09-md-02100-DRH MDL No. 2100 This Document Relates To: Holly Ashby v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 11-cv-10348-DRH Regina Criscione v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 12-cv-11380-DRH Katherine Jensen v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 12-cv-10532-DRH Bethany Jones v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 11-cv-10494-DRH Diane McMorris v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 11-cv-10975-DRH Keiko Mori v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 11-cv-10385-DRH Lori Olson v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 11-cv-10140-DRH Chantel Owens v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 11-cv-10493-DRH Camille Parberry-Waller v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 11-cv-10388-DRH Mallori Pulver v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 11-cv-10429-DRH Maryann Van Ausdall v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 11-cv-12432-DRH Rebecca Withers v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 11-cv-10594-DRH JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE DECISION BY COURT. These matters are before the Court for the purpose of docket control. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Stipulations of Dismissal filed on March 19, 2014, the above captioned cases are DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs. NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, CLERK OF COURT BY: /s/Sara Jennings Deputy Clerk Dated: March 20, 2014 Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2014.03.20 05:16:45 -05'00' APPROVED: CHIEF JUDGE U. S. DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?