Sebastian v. Bayer Corporation et al

Filing 9

ORDER GRANTING 8 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Caron Sebastian. Attorneys Brian A. Goldstein and Michael J Williams terminated. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 09/10/2014. (kbl)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
------------------------------------------------------------

X

IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE)
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF
MDL No. 2100

-----------------------------------------------------------Pirraglia v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
Inc. et al No. 3:11-cv-10925-DRH-PMF

Judge David R. Herndon
ORDER

Sanabria v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
Inc. et al No. 3:11-cv-11048-DRH-PMF
Sebastian v. Bayer Healthcare
Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al No. 3:11-cv-11162DRH-PMF
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO WITHDRAW
HERNDON, Chief Judge:
Movant seeks leave to withdraw as counsel of record for the plaintiffs in
the above captioned cases. After considering the movant’s motions, the Court
finds that the requirements of Local Rule 83.1 and of the applicable provisions
of the Rules of Professional Conduct pertaining to withdrawal of counsel have
been satisfied. The motions are therefore GRANTED.
Further, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1. The Court directs movant to serve a copy of this order of withdrawal
within 7 days upon all counsel of record and upon unrepresented
parties as required by Local Rule 83.1.
2. Supplementary Entry of Appearance: Should plaintiffs choose to
continue pursuing this action, plaintiffs or their new counsel must file a
supplementary entry of appearance within 21 days of the entry of
this Order.

3. Production or Discovery Extensions: No production or discovery
extensions are requested.
4. If plaintiffs or their new counsel fail to file a supplementary entry
of appearance within 21 days of the entry of this Order, plaintiffs’
action will be subject to dismissal without prejudice under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to comply
with the orders of this Court.
5. Further, if after 21 days of the entry of this Order, the plaintiffs are
not in compliance with the requirements of CMO 12, CMO 60 or
CMO 61, their actions will be subject to dismissal WITH PREJUDICE
in accord with the provisions of those case management orders.
SO ORDERED:

Digitally signed by
David R. Herndon
Date: 2014.09.10
19:34:42 -05'00'
Chief Judge
United States District Court

Date: September 10, 2014