Saenz v. Bayer Corporation et al
Filing
19
CLERK'S JUDGMENT Closing Case and Dismissing with Prejudice approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 3/4/2015. (rah)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ
(DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
)
)
)
)
)
3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF
MDL No. 2100
This Document Relates To:
Autumn Saenz v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
Amy Wild v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 3:11-cv-12059-DRH-PMF
Sarah Prueter v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 3:11-cv-12313-DRH-PMF
Mallory Schwartz v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 3:11-cv-11838-DRH-PMF
Heidi Stirling v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 3:10-cv-13651-DRH-PMF
Ilene Suarez v. Bayer Corporation, et al. 1
No. 3:11-cv-11104-DRH-PMF
Lindsey Worthen v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 3:10-cv-20233-DRH-PMF
Kristeena Joann Overstreet v. Bayer Corporation,
et al. 2
No. 3:10-cv-11402-DRH-PMF
Felicia L. Goodwin v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 3:11-cv-10055-DRH-PMF
Tammy Jo Simons v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 3:12-cv-10018-DRH-PMF
Kelsey Underwood v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 3:12-cv-20007-DRH-PMF
Cecile Byrd v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 3:13-cv-20008-DRH-PMF
Tamara Arceneaux v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
2
No. 3:11-cv-12316-DRH-PMF
Kaylan Edwards v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
1
No. 3:11-cv-11897-DRH-PMF
No. 3:10-cv-10811-DRH-PMF
Plaintiff a/k/a Ilene Suarez Ngiralbong.
Plaintiff a/k/a Kristeena Joann Dillon.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
DECISION BY COURT. This matter is before the Court for the purpose of
docket control.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the
Stipulations of Dismissal filed on March 4, 2015, the above captioned cases are
DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs.
JUSTINE FLANAGAN,
ACTING CLERK OF COURT
APPROVED:
Digitally signed by
David R. Herndon
Date: 2015.03.04
14:22:45 -06'00'
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
2
BY: /s/ Caitlin Fischer
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?