Weilbrenner v. Bayer Corporation et al

Filing 10

ORDER granting 8 Motion to Vacate. The Clerk of the Court is directed to reinstate this case. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 6/19/2012. (dsw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS _________________________________________ ) IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE)) 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND ) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) MDL No. 2100 _________________________________________ ) ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL This Document Relates to: Kristy Weilbrenner v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12654-DRH-PMF Kristen Vaughn, a minor by her mother and natural guardian, Jacqueline Vaughn v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:10-cv-11812-DRH-PMF Laura M. Brown and Matthew Brown v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10805-DRH-PMF. Sabrina Lane, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-20002-DRH-PMF 1 Keri Griesbach, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al No. 3:11-cv-20003-DRH-PMF 2 Diana DeLuna, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-20001-DRH-PMF 3 1 This Order applies to Plaintiffs April Barnes-Mosley, Brandy Barron, Christine Barzee, Donna, Beasley, Alyson Brown, Kelly Bryant, Guadalupe Cerda, Paige Christophel, Katherine Clough, Marie Cooper, Toni Corley, Ashley Corona, Latosha Davis, Julia Donahue, Ashley Dooley, Wendy Edwards, Angela Vargas, Tonya Watton, Lindsey Wheeler, and Denise White. 2 Plaintiffs Susan Lyons, Tracy Maden, Lori Miller, Arlene Monroe, Ellen Petrina, Romona Pullins, Samantha Quiles, Amye Quinn, Stacie Stelly, Kina Williams, and Ginna Wolfe. 3 This Order applies to Plaintiffs Melissa Franic, Courtney Fultz, Donna Gabbard, Tami Harvell, Savanna Raether, Lutwan Rayford, Jocelyn Reynolds, and Krissy Swyers. ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL HERNDON, Chief Judge: The plaintiffs in the above captioned actions have filed motions to vacate the Court’s order of dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with Plaintiff Fact Sheet Requirements Each plaintiff states that she is now in compliance with her PFS obligations. Id. As to each of the above referenced plaintiffs, Bayer has filed a notice of non-opposition. Accordingly, the Court hereby vacates the orders dismissing without prejudice plaintiffs’ actions and thereby reinstates the above referenced plaintiffs’ actions. In accord with this order the Court directs the Clerk of the Court as follows: Kristy Weilbrenner v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12654-DRH-PMF o Member action shall be reinstated Kristen Vaughn, a minor by her mother and natural guardian, Jacqueline Vaughn v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:10-cv-11812-DRH-PMF o Member action shall be reinstated Laura M. Brown and Matthew Brown v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv10805-DRH-PMF o Member action shall be reinstated Sabrina Lane, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-20002-DRH-PMF o The claims of the following plaintiffs shall be reinstated: April Barnes-Mosley, Brandy Barron, Christine Barzee, Donna, Beasley, Alyson Brown, Kelly Bryant, Guadalupe Cerda, Paige Christophel, Katherine Clough, Marie Cooper, Toni Corley, Ashley Corona, Latosha Davis, Julia Donahue, Ashley Dooley, Wendy Edwards, Angela Vargas, Tonya Watton, Lindsey Wheeler, and Denise White. Keri Griesbach, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-20003-DRH-PMF o The claims of the following plaintiffs shall be reinstated: Plaintiffs Susan Lyons, Tracy Maden, Lori Miller, Arlene Monroe, Ellen Petrina, Romona Pullins, Samantha Quiles, Amye Quinn, Stacie Stelly, Kina Williams, and Ginna Wolfe. Diana DeLuna, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. No. 3:11-cv-20001-DRH-PMF o The claims of the following plaintiffs shall be reinstated: Melissa Franic, Courtney Fultz, Donna Gabbard, Tami Harvell, Savanna Raether, Lutwan Rayford, Jocelyn Reynolds, and Krissy Swyers. SO ORDERED: Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2012.06.19 15:04:39 -05'00' Chief Judge United States District Court Date: June 19, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?