Melo v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
Filing
29
CLERK'S JUDGMENT DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 1/12/16. (jlrr )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE)
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
)
)
)
)
)
3:09-md-02100-DRH
MDL No. 2100
This Document Relates To:
Michelle Hairston v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 12-cv-11572-DRH
Paula Hallin v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 13-cv-10818-DRH
Amber Hamilton v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 12-cv-10980-DRH
Shirley Harrington v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 12-cv-11550-DRH
Angela Harris v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 10-cv-10473-DRH
Tiffany Harrison v. Bayer Schering
Pharma AG, et al.
No. 10-cv-13075-DRH
Holly J. Hebert v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 12-cv-10793-DRH
Stephanie Helbert v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 12-cv-11678-DRH
Debra Herman v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 13-cv-10822-DRH
Megan Higgins v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 13-cv-10852-DRH
Cynthia Hill v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 12-cv-11073-DRH
Jennifer Hitchman v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 11-cv-13100-DRH
Cheryl Hornberger v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 14-cv-10200-DRH
Amanda Hunt v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 10-cv-11096-DRH
Marie Jarrett v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 13-cv-10730-DRH
Kelly Johnson v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 14-cv-10006-DRH
Vicky L. King v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 11-cv-12671-DRH
Michelle Knoller v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 11-cv-12360-DRH
Brooke Krakora v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 11-cv-20157-DRH
Lillian Lamay v. Bayer Schering
Pharma AG, et al.
No. 11-cv-10751-DRH
Mistie Langford v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 10-cv-13208-DRH
Mary Susan Laughlin, et al. v. Bayer
Corporation, et al.
No. 12-cv-20103-DRH
Melissa Lepore v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 12-cv-11257-DRH
Janise Lester v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 11-cv-10173-DRH
Jodie Love v. Bayer Schering Pharma AG, et al.
No. 12-cv-11660-DRH
Tiffany Mabry v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 11-cv-10885-DRH
Lashawn Marshall as Mother and Next Friend
of Makayla Marshall, a Minor v. Bayer
HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 14-cv-10361-DRH
Chanistia Martiny v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 12-cv-20001-DRH
Stephanie Mash v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 11-cv-11808-DRH
Jamie Maslar v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 12-cv-20117-DRH
2
Annette Mathes v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 10-cv-11837-DRH
Debbie Caine Matthews v. Bayer
Corporation, et al.
No. 13-cv-20025-DRH
Anna Maynard v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 12-cv-10156-DRH
Brandy McCulloch v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 13-cv-10580-DRH
Marlene Melo v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 11-cv-12823-DRH
Stacy Mills v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 09-cv-20069-DRH
Erin Minton v. McKesson Corporation, et al.
No. 10-cv-20410-DRH
Patsy Mitchell v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 10-cv-11069-DRH
Lori Mueller, et al. v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 14-cv-10315-DRH
Misty Myers v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 10-cv-12822-DRH
Angela Nettles v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 11-cv-12568-DRH
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
DECISION BY COURT. These matters are before the Court for the purpose
of docket control.
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order
granting the Motions to Dismiss, the above captioned cases are DISMISSED with
prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs.
JUSTINE FLANAGAN,
ACTING CLERK OF COURT
BY: /s/Caitlin Fischer
Deputy Clerk
Digitally signed by
Judge David R. Herndon
Date: 2016.01.12
09:37:18 -06'00'
APPROVED:
DISTRICT JUDGE
U. S. DISTRICT COURT
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?