Byrd et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al

Filing 20

ORDER granting 9 Motion to Vacate. As to certain plaintiffs, movant seeks to vacate the order of dismissal entered for failure to comply with PFS obligations 5 . Bayer has not responded. Accordingly, the Court hereby vacates the order of dismis sal 5 as to the following plaintiffs and directs the Clerk of the Court to reinstate the same: Lacy Bailey, ElizabethBailey-Smith, Barbara Brodersen, Shelli Daniels Vinson, Danielle Garner, AshleyGross, Jamie Jeromin, Tricia Kelly-Learman, Maria Manahan, Emily Mayer,Kristen Ozinga, Valerie Schatz, Amalia Soliz, Shannon Lealos, Melanie Wallace,and Malissa Ward. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 6/4/2012. (dsw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS _________________________________________ ) IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE)) 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND ) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) MDL No. 2100 _________________________________________ ) ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL This Document Relates to: Katie Chor, et al., v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al, No. 3:11-cv-12891-DRH-PMF 1 Kimberly Byrd, et al. v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12890-DRH-PMF 2 ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: On March 1, 2012, the Court granted Bayer’s motion to dismiss without prejudice the claims of certain plaintiffs for failure to comply with their Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS) requirements. Presently before the Court are motions to vacate the order of dismissal as to certain plaintiffs in the above captioned cases. In member action Katie Chor, et al., v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al, No. 3:11-cv-12891-DRH-PMF, the following plaintiffs have filed a 1 This order applies to the following plaintiffs: Traci Nurse, Unique Pirtle, Shannon Rachal, Tshangie Smith, and Loralee Ivkovic. 2 This order applies to the following plaintiffs: Lacy Bailey, Elizabeth BaileySmith, Barbara Brodersen, Shelli Daniels Vinson, Danielle Garner, Ashley Gross, Jamie Jeromin, Tricia Kelly-Learman, Maria Manahan, Emily Mayer, Kristen Ozinga, Valerie Schatz, Amalia Soliz, Shannon Lealos, Melanie Wallace, and Malissa Ward. motion to vacate the Court’s order of dismissal: Traci Nurse, Unique Pirtle, Shannon Rachal, Tshangie Smith, and Loralee Ivkovic. In member action Kimberly Byrd, et al. v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12890-DRH-PMF, the following plaintiffs have filed a motion to vacate the Court’s order of dismissal: Lacy Bailey, Elizabeth Bailey-Smith, Barbara Brodersen, Shelli Daniels Vinson, Danielle Garner, Ashley Gross, Jamie Jeromin, Tricia Kelly-Learman, Maria Manahan, Emily Mayer, Kristen Ozinga, Valerie Schatz, Amalia Soliz, Shannon Lealos, Melanie Wallace, and Malissa Ward. Both motions to vacate were filed on April 26, 2012. To date, Bayer has not responded to plaintiffs’ motion to vacate. In light of Bayer’s failure to oppose the motion to vacate, the Court presumes that the subject plaintiffs have complied with their PFS obligations. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the orders dismissing without prejudice the claims of the following plaintiffs and directs the Clerk of the Court to REINSTATE the same: In member action Katie Chor, et al., v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al, No. 3:11-cv-12891-DRH-PMF: 1. Traci Nurse, 2. Unique Pirtle, 3. Shannon Rachal, 4. Tshangie Smith, and 5. Loralee Ivkovic. In member action Kimberly Byrd, et al. v. Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12890-DRH-PMF: 1. Lacy Bailey, 2. Elizabeth Bailey-Smith, 3. Barbara Brodersen, 4. Shelli Daniels Vinson, 5. Danielle Garner, 6. Ashley Gross, 7. Jamie Jeromin, 8. Tricia Kelly-Learman, 9. Maria Manahan, 10. Emily Mayer, 11. Kristen Ozinga, 12. Valerie Schatz, Bayer HealthCare 13. Amalia Soliz, 14. Shannon Lealos, 15. Melanie Wallace, and 16. Malissa Ward. SO ORDERED: Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2012.06.04 17:09:22 -05'00' Chief Judge United States District Court Date: June 4, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?