Leib et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
Filing
21
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Vacate 17 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 7/30/3012. (dsw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
_________________________________________
)
IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE))
3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND
)
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
)
MDL No. 2100
_________________________________________
)
ORDER
VACATING DISMISSAL
This Document Relates to:
Peter Rashke, as Administrator of the Estate of No. 3:11-cv-11492-DRH-PMF
Susan J. Mihna, Deceased v. Bayer Corp., et al.
Siobhan McGee v. Bayer Corp., et al.
No. 3:11-cv-12797-DRH-PMF
Lauren Lieb and Andrew Lieb v.
Bayer Corp., et al.
No. 3:11-cv-20091-DRH-PMF
Brittany McKenrick v. Bayer Corp., et al.
No. 3:11-cv-10488-DRH-PMF
ORDER
HERNDON, Chief Judge:
In June 2012, the Court dismissed the above captioned cases, without
prejudice, for failure to comply with this Court’s Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS)
requirements. The above captioned plaintiffs have since filed motions to vacate
those dismissals stating that they are now compliance with the PFS requirements.
Bayer has responded in each case and states that it is not opposed to
reinstatement.
Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the orders dismissing the above
captioned cases without prejudice. Further, the Court directs the Clerk of the
Court to REINSTATE the same.
SO ORDERED:
Digitally signed by
David R. Herndon
Date: 2012.07.30
10:20:55 -05'00'
Chief Judge
United States District Court
Date: July 30, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?