Amos v. Roal
Filing
9
ORDER re State Court Records ( Action due by 4/1/2013.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 3/1/13. (sgp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
DAVID ALLEN AMOS,
Petitioner,
v.
WENDY J. ROAL,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:12-cv-141-DRH-DGW
ORDER
WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge:
The Petition in this matter states that Petitioner was incarcerated in state prison on a state
parole violation on December 15, 2004. He was then taken into federal custody on June 24, 2005
and held pending resolution of federal charges against him. Respondent asserts that he was
subsequently sentenced by the federal court on March 31, 2006 and that he returned to state
custody until his parole violation sentence termed on May 24, 2006. He then was transferred to
federal custody where he remains. Petitioner is challenging the manner in which the Bureau of
Prisons is crediting the time he physically spent in a federal prison from June 24, 2005 to March
31, 2006. Petitioner contends that this 9 month period should be credited to his federal sentence.
Respondent argues that this 9 month period was credited to his state sentence and cannot be
credited towards his federal sentence.
In order to fully address the issues raised in the Petition (Doc. 1) and Response (Doc. 6), it
is necessary for the Court to examine the state court records related to Petitioner’s parole violation
and the sentence imposed for that violation.
Pursuant to Rule 5(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United
States District Court (as they apply to this § 2241 Petition), the Respondent shall provide the state
court records related to that parole violation and the sentence imposed. Respondent shall provide
the records within 30 days of the date of this Order; if Respondent is unable to acquire the records,
she shall inform the Court as soon as possible.
DATED: March 1, 2013
DONALD G. WILKERSON
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?