Longoria v. Ventlemen et al

Filing 119

ORDER denying 118 Motion return of filing fee. See attached for details. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/10/2013. (jls)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
SALVADOR LONGORIA
Plaintiffs,
vs.
RANDY J. DAVIS, C/O PEYTON, C/O
HARBISON,
and
CHARLES
DINTLEMAN,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 12–cv–0234–MJR–SCW

ORDER
REAGAN, District Judge:
On December 9, 2013 (yesterday), the undersigned judge denied pro se Plaintiff Salvador
Longoria’s motion because it lacked the decorum expected of parties. (See Doc. 117). The Court
further indicated it was willing to address any requests made by Plaintiff, but that “he should submit
those requests with the propriety and decorum expected of a party addressing the federal courts.”
(Id.).
Within five hours of the entry of yesterday’s order, another motion from Plaintiff was
docketed. It appears that motion was crafted well before the entry of the Court’s order: it contains
many of the same frivolous assertions (and uses the same tone) as his previously denied motion.
The Court therefore DENIES without prejudice Mr. Longoria’s motion (Doc. 118) for the same
reasons articulated in yesterday’s Order, and again invites him to file a more decorous motion should
he wish to raise the issue of his filing fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: December 10, 2013

s/ Michael J. Reagan
MICHAEL J. REAGAN
United States District Judge
1