Merritte v. Kessell et al

Filing 225

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Plaintiffs Pro Se Objection (Doc. 213) to Magistrate Judges Order (Doc. 212) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/6/2015. (jdh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CALVIN MERRITTE, # R-53322, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. C/O KESSELL, et. al., Defendants. Case No. 12-cv-00263-JPG-PMF MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Pro Se Objection (Doc. 213) to Magistrate Judge’s Order (Doc. 212) denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Issue Subpoena (Doc. 211) as the Plaintiff sought production of documents outside the 100 mile limit set forth at Rule 45(c)(2)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As stated in Magistrate Judge Frazier’s Order: “Although attorneys may issue subpoenas on their own, pro se litigants must have their subpoenas issued through the Court Clerk. Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(a)(3).” At the time Plaintiff filed his Motion to Issue Subpoenas and his Objection to the denial of his motion, he was pro se. Subsequently, Plaintiff has been appointed counsel and his attorney may issue subpoenas he believes necessary without approval of the Court. As such, Plaintiff’s Pro Se Objection (Doc. 213) to Magistrate Judge’s Order (Doc. 212) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 10/6/2015 s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?