Knox v. Powers et al

Filing 225

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE in favor of Andrew Tilden, Camille Adams, Carol George, Claudia Leslie, Delores Humele, Gracy Hart, Heather Meads, Julie Klien, Kathy Butler, Kristy Watson, Lakesha Baker-Camby, Laura Qualls, Marvin Powers, Merily Merton, Nigel Vinyard, Rhonna Medlin, Shelvy Dunn against Christopher Knox. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 9/30/15. (amv)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
CHRISTOPHER KNOX,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DR. MARVIN POWERS, CAMILLE ADAMS,
CAROL GEORGE, LAURA QUALLS,
ROHNNA MEDLIN, JULIE KLIEN, KATHY
BUTLER, GRACY HART, DELORES
HUMELE, HEATHER MEADS, CLAUDIA
LESLIE, MERILY MERTON, LAKESHA
BAKER-CAMBY, SHELVY DUNN, KRISTY
WATSON, NIGEL VINYARD and DR.
ANDREW TILDEN,
Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.

12-624-SCW

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Defendants CAMILLE ADAMS, CAROL GEORGE, LAURA QUALLS, THONNA MEDLIN,

JULIE KLIEN, KATHY BUTLER, GRACY HART, DELORES HUMELE, HEATHER MEADS,

CLAUDIA LESLIE, MERILY MERTON, LAKESHA BAKER-CAMBY, SHALVY DUNN, KRISTY

WATSON and NIGEL VINYARD were granted summary judgment on August 18, 2014 by an
Order entered Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan (Doc. 182).

The remaining case was dismissed on September 29, 2015 by an Order entered by

U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 224).

THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of defendants DR. MARVIN POWERS,

CAMILLE ADAMS, CAROL GEORGE, LAURA QUALLS, ROHNNA MEDLIN, JULIE
KLIEN, KATHY BUTLER, GRACY HART, DELORES HUMELE, HEATHER MEADS,
CLAUDIA LESLIE, MERILY MERTON, LAKESHA BAKER-CAMBY, SHELVY DUNN,
Page 1 of 2

KRISTY WATSON, NIGEL VINYARD and DR. ANDREW TILDEN and against Plaintiff
CHRISTOPHER KNOX.
The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this
Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action.

judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule

59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These deadlines for motions under
Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court. The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30

days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal. This period can only be
extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown.
DATED this 29th day of September, 2015

JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK
BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald
Deputy Clerk
Approved by

/s/ Stephen C. Williams
United States Magistrate Judge
Stephen C. Williams

Page 2 of 2