Norington v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al

Filing 69

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 66 Motion ; DENYING AS MOOT 67 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DENYING 68 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 7/12/13. (sgp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
DAVID NORINGTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
LIEUTENANT SCOTT, et al.
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:12-cv-807-GPM-DGW

ORDER
WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge:
Now pending before the Court are the Motion for Subpoenas (, the Motion for Leave to
Proceed in forma pauperis, and the Motion to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff, David
Norington, on July 10, 2013.

The Motion for Subpoenas is DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE(Doc. 66), the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED AS
MOOT (Doc. 67), and the Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED (Doc. 68).
In an Order dated May 9, 2013 (Doc. 65), Plaintiff was informed that discovery will not
commence until after the District Court has ruled on the Report and Recommendation. After such
a ruling, Plaintiff may conduct discovery on the merits of this matter. Plaintiff already is
proceeding in forma pauperis in this matter. Finally, for the reasons set forth in this Court’s
previous Order dated February 20, 2013 (Doc. 50), an attorney will not be recruited in this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 12, 2013
DONALD G. WILKERSON
United States Magistrate Judge