Robinson v. Astrue

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING 23 Report and Recommendations. The Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES with prejudice the complaint. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 11/25/2013. (kbl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JOHN LEE ROBINSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. No. 12-cv-842-DRH-CJP CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. HERNDON, Chief Judge: ORDER On July 25, 2012, John Robinson, Jr. filed a complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security for judicial review of an administrative agency’s decision (Doc. 2). Specifically, Robinson seeks judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision denying him Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 423. On October 28, 2013, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), United States Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud submitted a Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) finding that the Administrative Law Judge committed no errors of law and that his findings were supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Proud recommended that the Court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Robinson’s applications for DIB and SSI. The Report was sent to the parties with a notice informing them of their right to appeal by way of filing “objections” by November 15, 2013. To date, none Page 1 of 2 of the parties have filed objections, and the period in which to file objections has expired. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court need not conduct a de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). Thus, the Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 23). The Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s decision and DISMISSES with prejudice the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Singed this 25th day of November, 2013. Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2013.11.25 10:41:27 -06'00' Chief Judge United States District Court Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?