Wallace v. Fisher & Ludlow, Inc.

Filing 39

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice for failing to show cause and respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment 35 . The Clerk is instructed to close the file and enter judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff.Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 1/13/2014. (mtm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JOE WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. FISHER & LUDLOW, INC. Defendant. Case 12-cv-977-DRH-PMF MEMORANDUM & ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: Due to plaintiff’s failure to show cause and respond to defendant’s motion for summary judgment on or before January 6, 2014, the Court now dismisses plaintiff Joe Wallace’s claims with prejudice and enters judgment in favor of defendant. The Court, on motion of plaintiff’s counsel, allowed attorney Greg Roosevelt to withdraw from further representation of plaintiff, on October 1, 2013. The Court advised plaintiff that he must obtain other counsel within 21 days of entry of the Court’s Order of withdrawal. As of this date, no new counsel has entered an appearance. Additionally, on October 9, 2013, defendant moved for summary judgment under Rule 56, on all of plaintiff’s claims (Doc. 35). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff’s allotted time for responding to defendant’s motion has long since passed. See SDIL-LR 7.1. Page 1 of 2 Further, the Court has provided plaintiff with sufficient notice of the consequences of his failure to respond to defendant’s request for summary judgment. See Timms v. Frank, 953 F.2d 281, 284 (7th Cir. 1992); Doc. 38. Thus, in light of plaintiff’s repeated failure to show cause and respond to defendant’s motion for summary judgment, plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice and judgment shall be entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. The Clerk is instructed to close the file and enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this13th day of January, 2014. Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2014.01.13 11:33:18 -06'00' Chief Judge U.S. District Court Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?