Freeman et al v. The R.E.M. Group, Inc.

Filing 21

ORDER denying as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss filed by Berkeley Contract Packaging; denying as moot 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by The R.E.M. Group; granting 19 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 3/21/2013. (kar)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANDREA FREEMAN, ANGELA VASQUEZ, and SHAWN ROBERTS, Plaintiffs, v. BERKELEY CONTRACT PACKAGING, L.L.C., and THE R.E.M. GROUP, INC., Defendants. No. 12-cv-01255-DRH-SCW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: Pending now before the Court is plaintiffs Andrea Freeman, Angela Vasquez, and Shawn Roberts, collectively (“plaintiffs”)’s motion for leave to amend their complaint by consent (Doc. 19). Due to defendant Berkeley’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 15), which was joined by defendant R.E.M. Group (Doc. 17), plaintiffs seek to amend their complaint to address the issues raised in defendants’ motions to dismiss. Insofar as defendants have consented to the motion to amend, the Court hereby GRANTS plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file amended complaint. Page 1 of 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Berkeley’s and R.E.M.’s motions to dismiss (Docs. 15 & 17 respectively) are DENIED as moot, and may be refiled based on the amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 21st day of March, 2013. Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2013.03.21 16:12:01 -05'00' Chief Judge United States District Court Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?