Hankins v. Bayer Corporation et al
Filing
8
CLERK'S JUDGMENT DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 7/22/14. (rah)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ
)
(DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES
)
3:09-md-02100-DRH
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
)
LITIGATION
)
MDL No. 2100
)
This Document Relates To:
Sheryl Courtney, et al. v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 12-cv-10130-DRH
Cynthia Coy v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 11-cv-13606-DRH
Cindy Doughty v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 09-cv-20082-DRH
Laura Hankins v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 12-cv-10375-DRH
Amanda Ilse, et al. v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 12-cv-10913-DRH
Virginia Kilpatrick v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 12-cv-11417-DRH
Julia Maktaz v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 11-cv-13175-DRH
Alisa Maximova, et al. v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 12-cv-10596-DRH
Debra Reuter v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
No. 11-cv-12111-DRH
Holly Sabel v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 10-cv-11703-DRH
Laura Vander Stelt v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 12-cv-10604-DRH
Courtney Welcome, et al. v. Bayer
Corporation, et al.
No. 10-cv-13726-DRH
Charity Waldner v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 12-cv-11416-DRH
Emily Williams v. Bayer Corporation, et al.
No. 10-cv-11951-DRH
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
DECISION BY COURT.
These matters are before the Court for the
purpose of docket control.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the
Stipulations of Dismissal filed on July 22, 2014, the above captioned cases are
DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs.
JUSTINE FLANAGAN,
ACTING CLERK OF COURT
BY: /s/Caitlin Fischer
Deputy Clerk
Dated: July 22, 2014
Digitally signed by
David R. Herndon
Date: 2014.07.22
14:36:53 -05'00'
APPROVED:
CHIEF JUDGE
U. S. DISTRICT COURT
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?