Martin v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Filing 20

CLERK'S JUDGMENT Dismissing Case with Prejudice Approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 4/11/2015. (cds)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) IN RE: PRADAXA (DABIGATRAN ) 3:12-md-02385-DRH ETEXILATE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY ) LITIGATION ) MDL No. 2385 ) This Document Relates To: Richard Brown, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Cecelia Brown vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50399 Claudie Kennimer vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:13-cv-51721 Lorraine Kincaid vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:13-cv-51719 Everett J. Van Dright vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50015 Michael R. Moragne vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50433 William Martin vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Civil Action No.: 3:12-cv-50016 James Pettas vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Civil Action No.: 3:13-cv-51229 Jean M. Chakanovsky vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50308 Thomas J. Eilers, Individually and as representative of the estate of Opal F. Eilers, Deceased vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50280 Billy Roden vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50299 Cologero Frank "Jerry" Mancuso vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:13-cv-60031 Otis Shelmire vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:13-cv-51906 Dana Dunn, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Doris Green, Deceased vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50213 Hope Dinicolantonio, as Next of Kin Estate of John B. Teel, Deceased vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:12-cv-60080 Clarence Albert Thornton vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:13-cv-51717 Martha Degregorio vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:13-cv-51663 Melisa Ertzberger, Individually and as the surviving spouse of Royce Ertzberger, Deceased vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50197 Velma Graham, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond Graham vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50457 2 Jacqueline Jones, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Jessie Willie Jones vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50063 Phyllis Soldo, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of Lucille Soldo, Deceased vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50512 Jordan Thomas vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:13-cv-50620 Douglas Carroll Quillen vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50535 Mylon Betts, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Myron Betts, Deceased vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:14-cv-50079 Dorothy Hodges vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. Civil Action No.: 3:13-cv-51631 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE DECISION BY COURT. These matters are before the Court for the purpose of docket control. 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order entered on March 30, 2015 the above captioned cases are DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs. JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK OF COURT BY: /s/Caitlin Fischer Deputy Clerk Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2015.04.11 14:55:10 -05'00' APPROVED: U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE U. S. DISTRICT COURT 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?