Demos v. USA
Filing
3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO OTHER DISTRICT: Case transferred to Western District of Washington. See Order for details. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 1/10/13. (klh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS,
Petitioner,
vs.
No. 13-CV-0014
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant.
ORDER
HERNDON, Chief Judge:
In this habeas corpus action, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, petitioner
brings a collateral attack on his 1972, 1974 and 1978 convictions for burglary,
assault and robbery for which he is serving a life sentence.
According to the petition, petitioner was convicted in the United States
Military Court. Further, the petition states that he is confined at the Clallam Bay
Correction Center located in the State of Washington, which is located in the
Western District of Washington.
28 U.S.C. § 128(b).
The petition does not
contain any allegations pertaining to this judicial district. Clearly, the Western
District of Washington is the proper forum for the hearing and determination of
this habeas corpus action, particularly because the records of petitioner’s
conviction may be found there, as may most of the participants in his trial.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241(d) and 1404(a), and on the Court’s own motion,
Page 1 of 2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, for a
determination as to whether Respondent should be held to answer the petition, 28
U.S.C. § 2243; 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Rule 4, and such further proceedings as that
Court may deem appropriate. Neither the writ of habeas corpus nor any rule
to show cause shall issue in this action unless so directed by the transferee
court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed this 10th day of January, 2013.
David R.
Herndon
2013.01.10
18:19:32 -06'00'
Chief Judge
United States District Court
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?