Demos v. USA

Filing 3

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO OTHER DISTRICT: Case transferred to Western District of Washington. See Order for details. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 1/10/13. (klh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Petitioner, vs. No. 13-CV-0014 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON Defendant. ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: In this habeas corpus action, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, petitioner brings a collateral attack on his 1972, 1974 and 1978 convictions for burglary, assault and robbery for which he is serving a life sentence. According to the petition, petitioner was convicted in the United States Military Court. Further, the petition states that he is confined at the Clallam Bay Correction Center located in the State of Washington, which is located in the Western District of Washington. 28 U.S.C. § 128(b). The petition does not contain any allegations pertaining to this judicial district. Clearly, the Western District of Washington is the proper forum for the hearing and determination of this habeas corpus action, particularly because the records of petitioner’s conviction may be found there, as may most of the participants in his trial. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241(d) and 1404(a), and on the Court’s own motion, Page 1 of 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, for a determination as to whether Respondent should be held to answer the petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2243; 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Rule 4, and such further proceedings as that Court may deem appropriate. Neither the writ of habeas corpus nor any rule to show cause shall issue in this action unless so directed by the transferee court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 10th day of January, 2013. David R. Herndon 2013.01.10 18:19:32 -06'00' Chief Judge United States District Court Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?