Beane v. Fleri

Filing 4

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 3/19/13. (klh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS KENNY BEANE, Plaintiff, No. 13-0253-DRH vs. TERESA FLELI, Defendant. MEMORANDUM and ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: On March 15, 2013, Kenny Beane, pro se, filed a civil rights suit against Tersa Fleri, Office Manager of the Housing Authority of Jefferson County, Illinois (Doc. 1). Along with his complaint, he filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a motion to appoint counsel (Docs. 2 & 3). After reviewing the pleadings, the Court cannot glean from the complaint any discernible cause of action against Fleri. In fact, his complaint is unintelligible. Specifically, the complaint states: “this housing Authority of Jefferson County [sic] is inhumane why it says no in take away my right to litigate and 1of vindicate my constitutional right because of the negligent conduct of the defendants my rights are nolmal [sic] everyday peoples [sic] living skills you can die people take your rights to eat food or right to protect yourself I have constitutional right to challenge this lease that it is inhumane.” (Doc. 1, p. 5). These allegations do not reference any facts from which the Court could infer that defendant is liable of anything. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009). The Court cannot find a claim here, much less a plausible one. For failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the Court DISMISSES without prejudice this complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). If Beane is able to articulate a cognizable claim, he may refile. The Court closes the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 19th day of March, 2013. Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2013.03.19 12:11:05 -05'00' Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?