Dupont et al v. Freight Feeder Aircraft Corporation, Inc. et al

Filing 52

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Court DISMISSES all claims in this case against defendants R. Darby Boland, Edward F. Eaton, Will Weeks and Kim Littlefield without prejudice for failure to timely effect service. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/13/2013. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JOHN J. DUPONT, RANDY MOSELEY and UTILICRAFT AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiffs, Case No. 13-cv-256-JPG-DGW v. FREIGHT FEEDER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, INC., L. DAVID BRIDGES, R. DARBY BOLAND, KEVIN WILLIAMS, STEPHEN CARMICHAEL, H. CLIFF SAYLOR, EDWARD F. EATON, WILL WEEKS, KIM LITTLEFIELD, and THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. LOUIS, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the August 20, 2013, order for the plaintiffs to show cause why their claims against defendants R. Darby Boland, Edward F. Eaton, Will Weeks and Kim Littlefield should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to timely effect service (Doc. 42). In its order to show cause, the Court warned the plaintiffs that their failure to respond in a timely manner to the order would result in dismissal of those claims. The plaintiffs have not responded to the order to show cause. Therefore, as it warned it would do, the Court DISMISSES all claims in this case against defendants R. Darby Boland, Edward F. Eaton, Will Weeks and Kim Littlefield without prejudice for failure to timely effect service. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. Defendants R. Darby Boland, Edward F. Eaton, Will Weeks and Kim Littlefield are terminated as parties to this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 13, 2013 s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?