Charles v. Gaetz et al

Filing 44

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; adopting 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety re 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Craig Charles. The Court denies as moot 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/22/2013. (jdh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
CRAIG CHARLES,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 13-cv-284-JPG-PMF

DONALD GAETZ, VIPIN K. SHAH,
CHRISTIE BROWN, K. DEEN and JACKIE
MILLER,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc.
42) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny as moot plaintiff
Craig Charles’ motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 7).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made.
Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those
unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir.
1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file
and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:


ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 42);



DENIES as moot Charles’ motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 7).

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 22, 2013
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE