Clarke v. USA

Filing 6

ORDER denying at this time 5 Motion to Copy. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 5/13/13. (klh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DAVID CLARKE, Plaintiff, No. 13-0342-DRH vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: Pending before the Court is Clarke’s motion for copies of his court transcripts (Doc. 5). Based on the following, the Court denies at this time the motion. In order to obtain documents free of charge Clarke must demonstrate: (1) that he has exhausted all means of access to his files (i.e. through his trial and appellate counsel), (2) that he is financially unable to secure access to his court files (i.e., through a showing similar required in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) which includes a certified copy of the prisoner’s account for the previous six-month period prior to filing), and (3) that the documents requested are necessary for the preparation of some specific non-frivolous court action. See United States v. Wilkinson, 618 F.2d 1215, 1218-19 (7th Cir. 1980); Rush v. United States, 559 F.2d 455, 459 Page 1 of 2 (7th Cir. 1977). These minimal requirements do not impose any substantial burden to financially unable prisoners who desire their records be sent to them at government expense. Here, defendant’s letter/motion is clearly insufficient. While the Court is satisfied that Clarke is indigent, his motion is silent as to whether he has exhausted his other sources – his previous attorneys - for obtaining the court documents he seeks. Accordingly, the Court DENIES as this time Clarke’s motion for copies of transcripts (Doc. 5). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 13th day of May, 2013. Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2013.05.13 13:29:23 -05'00' Chief Judge United States District Court Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?