Langfield v. Veath et al

Filing 27

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 26 );GRANTS Veath and Johnsons motion to dismiss on the basis of qualified immunity (Doc. 16 ); and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/16/2014. (jdh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
GARY LANGFIELD,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 13-cv-362-JPG

TIMOTHY R. VEATH, DAVID T.
JOHNSON, LORI OAKLEY, MICHAEL P.
ATCHISON, and S.A. GODINEZ,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc.
26) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court grant the motion to
dismiss filed by defendants Veath and Johnson (Doc. 16).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made.
Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those
unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir.
1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file
and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:


ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 26);



GRANTS Veath and Johnson’s motion to dismiss on the basis of qualified immunity (Doc.
16); and



DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 16, 2014
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE