Rommel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

ORDER awarding attorney's fee, per 22 Stipulation filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 3/11/2014. (jmt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CHARLES ROMMEL, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant. Civil No. 13-cv-383-CJP ORDER PROUD, Magistrate Judge: Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §2412. (Doc. 22). Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)(1)(B), the parties stipulate that plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and expenses in the amount of $875.00. The Court finds that plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the Act. The Court further finds that the agreed upon amount is reasonable and appropriate. The parties’ Stipulation (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. The Court awards plaintiff Charles Rommel the sum of $875.00 for attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. These funds shall be payable to plaintiff, per Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). However, in accordance with the parties’ agreement, any part of the award that is not subject to set-off to pay 1 plaintiff’s pre-existing debt to the United States shall be made payable to plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment previously executed by plaintiff and his attorney. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: March 11, 2014. s/ Clifford J. Proud CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?