Martin v. Hudson et al

Filing 18

CLERK'S JUDGMENT (NJR/bkl) Plaintiff's claim (Count 3) is dismissed with prejudice against Oakley, Brenner and Harrington; Counts 1 and 2 are dismissed without prejudice against defendants Hass, Hudson and Grott. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/8/13. (bkl)

Martin v. Hudson et al

Doc. 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
DERRICK MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 13-cv-416-JPG-PMF

MR. HUDSON, MR. HASS, ANGELA
GROTT, LORI OAKLEY, RICHARD
HARRINGTON and LORI BRENNER,
Defendants.
JUDGMENT
This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court
having rendered a decision as to some and the plaintiff having voluntarily dismissed others,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the following claim by plaintiff
Derrick Martin is dismissed with prejudice:


Count 3 against defendants Lori Oakley, Lori Brenner and Richard Harrington for failure
to respond to grievances; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the following claims by plaintiff

Derrick Martin are dismissed without prejudice:


Count I against defendants Mr. Hass, Mr. Hudson and Angela Grott for confiscating and/or
refusing to return paintings in violation of the First Amendment and against defendant
Richard Harrington for the purposes of injunctive relief; and



Count 2 against defendants Mr. Hass, Mr. Hudson and Angela Grott for taking paintings
and art supplies in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause.

DATED: August 8, 2013

NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, Clerk of Court
s/Brenda K. Lowe, Deputy Clerk

Approved:

s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com