Slayton v. Feralloy Corporation et al

Filing 42

ORDER granting 39 Motion for Summary Judgment. At the close of the case, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in favor of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 688 and against Elvis Slayton. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 7/28/15. (klh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ELVIS SLAYTON, Plaintiff, v. No. 14-0424-DRH FERALLOY CORPORATION, and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 688, Defendant. ORDER HERNDON, District Judge: Pending before the Court is defendant, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 688’s May 29, 2015 motion for summary judgment (Docs. 39 & 40). Specifically, defendant maintains that it is entitled to summary judgment as plaintiff cannot carry his burden of demonstrating the existence of a genuine issue of material fact as related to his duty of fair representation claim against it. As of this date, plaintiff has not responded to the motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court considers the failure to respond as an admission of the merits of the motion. 1 Thus, the Court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment on this claim. At the close of the case, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter 1 “An adverse party in a civil case shall have 30 days after service of a motion listed above to file a response. … Failure to timely file a response to a motion may, in the Court’s discretion, be considered an admission of the merits of the motion.” Local Rule 7.1(c). Page 1 of 2 judgment in favor of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 688, and against Elvis Slayton. IT IS SO ORDERED. Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2015.07.28 15:45:22 -05'00' Signed this 28th day of July, 2015. United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?