Castro v. United States of America et al
Filing
152
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 151 ) and DENIES Defendant USA's Motion (Doc. 126 ) for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/28/2016. (jdh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ANTHONY CASTRO,
Plaintiff,
vs.
USA, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 13-cv-00571-JPG-PMF
)
)
)
)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc.
151) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier with regard to Defendants USA’s Motion (Doc. 126)
for Summary Judgment. The parties did not file any objections to the R & R.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are
made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the
magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or
only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear
error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file
and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the
Report in its entirety (Doc. 151) and DENIES Defendant USA’s Motion (Doc. 126) for
Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 6/28/2016
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?