Rogers v. Anderson et al

Filing 11

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 10/2/2013. (tjk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ADRIAN W. ROGERS, Plaintiff, vs. VICKIE COOK ANDERSON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 13-723-GPM MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MURPHY, District Judge: On August 19, 2013, after mail from the Court to Plaintiff Adrian Rogers had been returned as undeliverable, Plaintiff was ordered to provide the Court with his current address no later than September 16, 2013 (Doc. 8). Plaintiff was explicitly warned that his failure to do so would result in the dismissal of his case (Doc. 8). Plaintiff’s deadline to notify this Court of his change of address has passed, and Plaintiff has failed to do so. As a result, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). Plaintiff’s obligation to pay the filing fee for this action was incurred at the time the action was filed, thus the filing fee of $350.00 remains due and payable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); Lucien v. Jockisch, 133 F.3d 464, 467 (7th Cir. 1998). The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to close this case. Page 1 of 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 2, 2013 s/ G. Patrick Murphy G. PATRICK MURPHY United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?