McKinley v. Harrington et al
Filing
114
JUDGMENT in favor of Joshua Schoenbeck, L. Phelps, Michael P Atchinson, Rick Harrington against Benard McKinley. All remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 4/10/17. (amv)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
BENARD McKINLEY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
RICK HARRINGTON, MICHAEL P.
ATCHISON, AIMEE LANG, JOSHUA
SCHOENBECK and L. PHELPS,
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 13-937-SCW
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendants Rick Harrington and Michael P. Atchison were dismissed with prejudice on
October 15, 2013, by an Order entered by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan (Doc. 7).
Defendants Joshua Schoenbeck and L. Phelps were severed from this case on October 22,
2014 by an Order entered by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan (Doc. 46).
THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants RICK HARRINGTON,
MICHAEL P. ATCHISON, JOSHUA SCHOENBECK and L. PHELPS and against Plaintiff
BENARD McKINLEY.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant an Order entered by
United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on December 21, 2016 (Doc.110) the remaining
claim in the above-captioned action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this judgment
for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule 59(b) or (e) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These deadlines for motions under Rule 59 cannot be extended by
Page 1 of 2
the Court. The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30 days from the date of this judgment to file a
notice of appeal. This period can only be extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown.
DATED this 10th day of April, 2017
JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK
BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald
Deputy Clerk
Approved by /s/ Stephen C. Williams
United States Magistrate Judge
Stephen C. Williams
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?