Peterson v. Dunlap et al

Filing 32

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 28 ); and DENIES Petersons motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. 22 ) Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/24/2014. (jdh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
MICHAEL A. PETERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 13-cv-1048-JPG-PMF

MICHAEL W. DUNLAP, MARC HODGE,
BRIAN STAFFORD, and LT. GOINS,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 28) of
Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Michael A. Peterson’s
motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. 22).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the
magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de
novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection
is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys.
Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds
that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:
•

ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 28); and

•

DENIES Peterson’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. 22).

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 24, 2014
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE