Smith v. Butler et al

Filing 187

JUDGMENT in favor of Chad Perrish, Cheyl Couch, Dr Shicker, Jagannathan Srinivasaraghavan, Kala Sims Robinson, Kathy Butler Lovies, Laura Qualls, Marvin Powers, Matt Payne, Mr Smith, Ms Ramsey, Rhonna Medlin, Terri Anderson, Wanda Evans, Wendy Blank against Allory Smith. All remaining issues are dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 11/7/16. (amv)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ALLORY SMITH,
Plaintiff,
vs.
KATHEY BULTER LOVIES, KALA SIMS
ROBINSON, MATT PAYNE, RHONNA
MEDLIN, LAURA QUALLS, WANDA
EVANS, CHERYL COUCH, DR. SHICKER,
DR. MARVIN POWERS, DR. WENDY
BLANK, MR. SMITH, MS. RAMSEY, CHAD
PERRISH, TERRI ANDERSON,
JAGANNATHAN SRINIVASARAGHAVAN,
and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.,
Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.

13-1215-SCW

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendants Rhonna Medlin, Laura Qualls, Wanda Evans, Dr. Shicker, Dr. Wendy Blank,
Mr. Smith, Ms. Ramsy, Chad Perrish, Terri Anderson, and Jagannathan Srinivasaraghavan, were
granted summary judgment on 1/5/15 by an Order entered by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan (Doc.
115).
Defendant Kala Sims Robinson, Matt Payne, Cheryl Couch and Dr. Marvin Powers were
granted summary judgment on 2/2/16 by an Order entered by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan (Doc.
155).

Defendants Kathy Butler Lovies was substituted and termed by an Order entered by

Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 10/18/16 (Doc. 186).

The remaining issues are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants KATHY BUTLER LOVIES,

KALA SIMS ROBINSON, MATT PAYNE, RHONNA MEDLIN, LAURA QUALLS, WANDA

EVANS, CHERYL COUCH, DR. SHICKER, DR. MARVIN POWERS, DR. WENDY BLANK, MR.
SMITH, MS. RAMSEY, CHAD PERRISH, TERRI ANDERSON, JAGANNATHAN
SRINIVASARAGHAVAN and against Plaintiff ALLORY SMITH.

The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this
judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment

under Rule 59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These deadlines for
motions under Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court. The Plaintiff should also
note that he has 30 days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal.
This period can only be extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown.
DATED this 7th day of November, 2016

JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK
BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald
Deputy Clerk
Approved by

/s/ Stephen C. Williams
United States Magistrate Judge
Stephen C. Williams