Santana v. Kempfer et al

Filing 87

CLERK'S JUDGMENT closing case and dismissing without prejudice. Judgment in favor of Unknown Party, Aaron Hood, Daniel Cushman, J Hart, J Kempfer, Joseph Newcomb, R Harrington, Sgt Pelker, Sgt Schurtz, T Veath and against Juan Santana. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/13/15. (rah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUAN SANTANA, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. J KEMPFER, et al., Defendants. Case No. 13-cv-01229-JPG-PMF JUDGMENT This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Claims against defendants J Kempfer, Sgt. Pelker, R Harrington, T Veath, J Hart, Sgt Schurtz, Joseph Newcomb, Aaron Hood, Daniel Cushman, and Unknown Party for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's medical needs, requests for assistance, and unsanitary cell conditions in violation of the 8th Amendment are dismissed without prejudice and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants J Kempfer, Sgt. Pelker, R Harrington, T Veath, J Hart, Sgt Schurtz, Joseph Newcomb, Aaron Hood, Daniel Cushman, and Unknown Party, and against plaintiff Juan Santana on his claim for deliberate indifference to his medical needs, requests for assistance, and unsanitary cell conditions in violation of the 8th Amendment. DATED: 10/13/2015 Approved: s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE s/ Reid Hermann, Deputy Clerk Justine Flanagan Acting Clerk of Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?