O'Quinn v. Gaetz et al

Filing 123

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 117 ); DENIES OQuinns motion for an emergency injunction or temporary restraining order (Doc. 97 ); DENIES OQuinns motion for future and current temporary restraining order (Do c. 100 ); DENIES OQuinns motion for immediate emergency temporary restraining order and injunctive relief (Doc. 103 ); and DENIES OQuinns motion for current and future injunctive orders (Doc. 108 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/8/2014. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CHESTER O’QUINN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 13-cv-1342-JPG-PMF DONALD GAETZ, THOMAS SPILLER, S.A. GODINEZ, DR. V. SHAH, A. RECTOR, MR. BLADES, JODY GOGETTING, JANET DAUGHERTY, NURSE AMY, NURSE ABBY and OFFICER OLMSTED, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 117) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Chester O’Quinn’s motion for an emergency injunction or temporary restraining order (Doc. 97), motion for future and current temporary restraining order (Doc. 100), motion for immediate emergency temporary restraining order and injunctive relief (Doc. 103) and motion for current and future injunctive orders (Doc. 108). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court has received no objection to the Report. It has reviewed the Report and finds it is not clearly erroneous and, accordingly:  ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 117);  DENIES O’Quinn’s motion for an emergency injunction or temporary restraining order (Doc. 97);  DENIES O’Quinn’s motion for future and current temporary restraining order (Doc. 100);  DENIES O’Quinn’s motion for immediate emergency temporary restraining order and injunctive relief (Doc. 103); and  DENIES O’Quinn’s motion for current and future injunctive orders (Doc. 108). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 8, 2014 s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?