O'Quinn v. Gaetz et al

Filing 129

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 125 ) DENIES OQuinns open motion for relief (Doc. 120 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/23/2015. (jdh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
CHESTER O’QUINN,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 13-cv-1342-JPG-PMF

DONALD GAETZ, THOMAS SPILLER, S.A.
GODINEZ, DR. V. SHAH, A. RECTOR, MR.
BLADES, JODY GOGETTING, JANET
DAUGHERTY, NURSE AMY, NURSE
ABBY and OFFICER OLMSTED,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc.
125) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Chester
O’Quinn’s open motion for relief (Doc. 120). Magistrate Judge Frazier found that O’Quinn’s
requests had been addressed in prior orders denying similar motions and that the prior orders do
not warrant reconsideration. O’Quinn has objected to the Report citing a number of events
unrelated to wrongs alleged in this case (Doc. 127).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made.
Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those
unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir.
1999).
The Court has reviewed O’Quinn’s objection and the entire case de novo and has
concluded that Magistrate Judge Frazier was correct in the Report for the reasons stated therein.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 125) DENIES O’Quinn’s open
motion for relief (Doc. 120).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 23, 2015
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE