Coulter v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc et al
Filing
11
ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 12/3/2014. (dsw, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
------------------------------------------------------------
X
IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE)
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF
MDL No. 2100
-----------------------------------------------------------Judge David R. Herndon
This Document Relates to:
Budesilich v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-11087DRH-PMF
Barros v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-12111-DRH-PMF
Bergquist v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-13049-
DRH-PMF
Pease v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-13050-DRH-PMF
Snyder v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-13321-DRH-PMF
Decarlis v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3 3:10-cv-13393-DRH-PMF
Murray v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-13804-DRH-PMF
Trabert v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10162-DRH-PMF
Carter v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10272-DRH-PMF
Pirraglia v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10925-DRH-PMF
Mack v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Page 1 of 6
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10987-DRH-PMF
Parkman v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10991-DRH-PMF
Polite v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11046-DRH-PMF
Sanabria v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3 3:11-cv-11048-DRH-PMF
Hill et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11109-DRH-PMF
Casugod v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11119-DRH-PMF
Sebastian v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11162-DRH-PMF
Kazemka v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11901-DRH-PMF
McLaughlin v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12952DRH-PMF
Rice v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
et al. No. 3:11-cv-13010-DRH-PMF
Logan v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13128-DRH-PMF
Gard v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
et al. No. 3:11-cv-13270-DRH-PMF
Russell v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13323-DRH-PMF
Busam et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-10690DRH-PMF 1
Douglas v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11132-DRH-PMF
Bronson v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
1
This Order applies to plaintiff Nita Patel only.
Page 2 of 6
Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11436-DRH-PMF
Gwaltney v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11605-DRH-PMF
Davis v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11606-DRH-PMF
Clark v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11608-DRH-PMF
Spencer v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11617-DRH-PMF
Embry v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11618-DRH-PMF
Gayles v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11619-DRH-PMF
Gillion-Bland v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11620-
DRH-PMF
Coulter v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10136-DRH-PMF
Burnett v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10204-DRH-PMF
Edwards v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10205-DRH-PMF
Everette v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10206-DRH-PMF
Felton v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10207-DRH-PMF
McCutcheon-Burse v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10208-
DRH-PMF
Steward v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10217-DRH-PMF
Warren v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10219-DRH-PMF
Page 3 of 6
Watson v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10219-DRH-PMF
Fontenot-Washington v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10220DRH-PMF
Jones v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10221-DRH-PMF
Marsalis v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10222-DRH-PMF
Perry et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10540DRH-PMF 2
Parker et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10541DRH-PMF 3
Outlaw et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10543DRH-PMF 4
Bridges et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10544DRH-PMF 5
Erdan et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10545DRH-PMF 6
Taylor et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3 3:13-cv10547-DRH-PMF 7
Scott et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10548DRH-PMF 8
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
This
This
This
This
This
This
This
Order applies to
Order applies to
Order applies to
Order applies to
Order applies to
Order applies to
Order applies to
plaintiff Jessica Godfrey only.
plaintiffs Sharon Crosby, Ella Jackson, and Sylvia Parker only.
plaintiff Christina Outlaw only.
plaintiff Barbara Lewis only.
plaintiffs Alayna Erdan, Josephine Minor, and Anna Zelaya only.
plaintiff Michelle Graham only.
plaintiff Linda Walker only.
Page 4 of 6
Ramos et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10562DRH-PMF 9
Craig v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10565-DRH-PMF
Little et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10569DRH-PMF 10
Stancil v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10573-DRH-PMF
Gabrey v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10574-DRH-PMF
Lavergne v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10576-DRH-PMF
Lanese et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10577DRH-PMF 11
Bush et al v. Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10581DRH-PMF 12
Ricca v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10595-DRH-PMF
Stricker v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10617-DRH-PMF
Rios v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
et al. No. 3:13-cv-10798-DRH-PMF
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
HERNDON, District Judge:
9
This Order applies to plaintiff Janette Ramos only.
This Order applies to plaintiff Stephanie Tullis only.
11
This Order applies to plaintiffs Stephanie Jones and Kelly Robertson only.
12
This Order applies to plaintiff Yannus Lovelady only.
10
Page 5 of 6
This matter is before the Court on the Bayer Defendants’ motions for an
order dismissing the above captioned plaintiffs’ claims without prejudice for
failure to file an appearance as required by this Court’s Order and Local Rule
83.1(g)(2).
In each of the above captioned cases, the Court granted a motion to
withdraw filed by counsel. The orders granting leave to withdraw expressly
provided that if the subject plaintiff (or her new counsel) failed to file a timely
supplementary entry of appearance, the action would be subject to dismissal
without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to
prosecute or to comply with the orders of this Court including failure to comply
with the Plaintiff Fact Sheet requirements.
To date, and in violation of this
Court’s orders and Local Rule 83.1(g), the above captioned plaintiffs have not filed
a supplementary appearance. In addition, none of the above captioned plaintiffs
have responded to the instant motion to dismiss.
The plaintiffs must comply with the Local Rules and this Court’s orders.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein, the claims of the
above captioned plaintiffs are hereby dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed this 3rd day of December, 2014.
Digitally signed
by David R.
Herndon
Date: 2014.12.03
12:54:15 -06'00'
District Judge
United States District Court
Page 6 of 6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?