Felton v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 12/3/2014. (dsw, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ------------------------------------------------------------ X IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF MDL No. 2100 -----------------------------------------------------------Judge David R. Herndon This Document Relates to: Budesilich v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-11087DRH-PMF Barros v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-12111-DRH-PMF Bergquist v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-13049- DRH-PMF Pease v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-13050-DRH-PMF Snyder v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-13321-DRH-PMF Decarlis v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3 3:10-cv-13393-DRH-PMF Murray v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:10-cv-13804-DRH-PMF Trabert v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10162-DRH-PMF Carter v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10272-DRH-PMF Pirraglia v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10925-DRH-PMF Mack v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Page 1 of 6 Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10987-DRH-PMF Parkman v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-10991-DRH-PMF Polite v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11046-DRH-PMF Sanabria v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3 3:11-cv-11048-DRH-PMF Hill et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11109-DRH-PMF Casugod v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11119-DRH-PMF Sebastian v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11162-DRH-PMF Kazemka v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-11901-DRH-PMF McLaughlin v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-12952DRH-PMF Rice v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13010-DRH-PMF Logan v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13128-DRH-PMF Gard v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13270-DRH-PMF Russell v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:11-cv-13323-DRH-PMF Busam et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-10690DRH-PMF 1 Douglas v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11132-DRH-PMF Bronson v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals 1 This Order applies to plaintiff Nita Patel only. Page 2 of 6 Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11436-DRH-PMF Gwaltney v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11605-DRH-PMF Davis v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11606-DRH-PMF Clark v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11608-DRH-PMF Spencer v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11617-DRH-PMF Embry v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11618-DRH-PMF Gayles v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11619-DRH-PMF Gillion-Bland v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:12-cv-11620- DRH-PMF Coulter v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10136-DRH-PMF Burnett v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10204-DRH-PMF Edwards v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10205-DRH-PMF Everette v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10206-DRH-PMF Felton v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10207-DRH-PMF McCutcheon-Burse v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10208- DRH-PMF Steward v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10217-DRH-PMF Warren v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10219-DRH-PMF Page 3 of 6 Watson v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10219-DRH-PMF Fontenot-Washington v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10220DRH-PMF Jones v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10221-DRH-PMF Marsalis v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10222-DRH-PMF Perry et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10540DRH-PMF 2 Parker et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10541DRH-PMF 3 Outlaw et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10543DRH-PMF 4 Bridges et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10544DRH-PMF 5 Erdan et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10545DRH-PMF 6 Taylor et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3 3:13-cv10547-DRH-PMF 7 Scott et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10548DRH-PMF 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 This This This This This This This Order applies to Order applies to Order applies to Order applies to Order applies to Order applies to Order applies to plaintiff Jessica Godfrey only. plaintiffs Sharon Crosby, Ella Jackson, and Sylvia Parker only. plaintiff Christina Outlaw only. plaintiff Barbara Lewis only. plaintiffs Alayna Erdan, Josephine Minor, and Anna Zelaya only. plaintiff Michelle Graham only. plaintiff Linda Walker only. Page 4 of 6 Ramos et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10562DRH-PMF 9 Craig v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10565-DRH-PMF Little et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10569DRH-PMF 10 Stancil v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10573-DRH-PMF Gabrey v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10574-DRH-PMF Lavergne v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10576-DRH-PMF Lanese et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10577DRH-PMF 11 Bush et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10581DRH-PMF 12 Ricca v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10595-DRH-PMF Stricker v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10617-DRH-PMF Rios v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. No. 3:13-cv-10798-DRH-PMF ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE HERNDON, District Judge: 9 This Order applies to plaintiff Janette Ramos only. This Order applies to plaintiff Stephanie Tullis only. 11 This Order applies to plaintiffs Stephanie Jones and Kelly Robertson only. 12 This Order applies to plaintiff Yannus Lovelady only. 10 Page 5 of 6 This matter is before the Court on the Bayer Defendants’ motions for an order dismissing the above captioned plaintiffs’ claims without prejudice for failure to file an appearance as required by this Court’s Order and Local Rule 83.1(g)(2). In each of the above captioned cases, the Court granted a motion to withdraw filed by counsel. The orders granting leave to withdraw expressly provided that if the subject plaintiff (or her new counsel) failed to file a timely supplementary entry of appearance, the action would be subject to dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to comply with the orders of this Court including failure to comply with the Plaintiff Fact Sheet requirements. To date, and in violation of this Court’s orders and Local Rule 83.1(g), the above captioned plaintiffs have not filed a supplementary appearance. In addition, none of the above captioned plaintiffs have responded to the instant motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs must comply with the Local Rules and this Court’s orders. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein, the claims of the above captioned plaintiffs are hereby dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 3rd day of December, 2014. Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2014.12.03 12:54:15 -06'00' District Judge United States District Court Page 6 of 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?